🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.