🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate atomic talks with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy produced results, and revealed new appeals had come from intermediaries to restart negotiations with the US government. He said Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is treading a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states employed their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be resurrected in some form if negotiations restart.

The American leader recently said he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but in private Tehran representatives say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Position

In his remarks to the forum, intended to paint the US as a controlling nation that misuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by armed force. He asserted the attacks began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith hard to rebuild.

Dialogue Remains the Final Answer

The foreign minister said: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned negotiations; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be alive and stays the final resolution to address disagreements, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained multiple understandings from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to destroy. The Iranian people have developed more powerful, more integrated, and more backing of the government and the state in the aftermath of this attack."